Re: look "problems" :)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Chris "Re: look "problems" :)"
• Previous message: Chris "look "problems" :)"

On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Chris wrote:

> Doh, that last post was a bit premature.
> 
> There are a list of options that are within a "#if 0 ... #endif"
> block (in configure.c)
> 
> It seems that some of the functions behind those are not implemented
> (yet?).
> 
> I'm going to go poke through the source some more...  Maybe some of
> the real developers could comment on this?  Am I missing something
> else, that is obvious as well?  :)

I don't know about obvious, but there have been some changes to the look 
handling in 1.5pre3.  Try using the look.Ethan and look.Guylhem that 
came with the distribution.  Don't worry, backwards compatibility should 
be restored soon. :)

If you're feeling adventurous, you can convert your look to the new 
styles.  There's a table that should help in PRE-ALPHA/LOOK.changes; it 
describes which "old" keyword maps to which "new" style/option.

Have fun!

----
Ethan Fischer
allanon@u.washington.edu
http://weber.u.washington.edu/~allanon


--
   WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
   FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
   MAIL:  http://wormhole.eosys.com/mailing-lists/AfterStep-Info.html

   To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail afterstep-request@eosys.com

• Next message: Chris "Re: look "problems" :)"
• Previous message: Chris "look "problems" :)"