Version number

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Brett Mason "Re: your mail "
• Previous message: Chris Burgess "Re: afterstep-digest V2 #69"

>I must have missed part of the discussion.
>What was wrong with calling it AfterStep 1.5?
>Why put on an expiration date?

I really think we should stick to some nomenclature like the Linux kernel
does ... take 1.4xxx for developement, 1.5 for stable, 1.6xxx for next
devel ... and so on ... maybe we should - like M$ is doing always - skip
one number and call the next stable 1.6 - like the kernels.

Vince

PS: There was a guy asking what makes the difference between AfterStep,
WindowMaker, Enlightenment etc. To be honest: I visited all the web sites
and did not really get the point of main advantages and disadvantages.

Another question: Can't there be put some effort together? I saw the lovely
Themes (themes.org) available and almost started to cry - so cute!

V.


--
   WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
   FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
   MAIL:  http://wormhole.eosys.com/mailing-lists/AfterStep-Info.html
   FAQ:   http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/zamboni/afterstep/FAQ.html

   To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail afterstep-request@eosys.com

• Next message: Brett Mason "Re: your mail "
• Previous message: Chris Burgess "Re: afterstep-digest V2 #69"