Re: Need to give up on 2.0

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Frank Gore "Re: Need to give up on 2.0"
• Previous message: Frank Gore "Re: Need to give up on 2.0"

Sure, I just did ./install.script and let
it do all the work.  I can do it one step at
a time if you can tell me which single step
that mod goes in.  I make hardware, not software!
The install.script causes a whole lot of things
to happen, and I really don't want to know *all*
the details, but I really like Afterstep and will
be happy to help find the bug.

Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike

----- Original Message -----
From: Frank Gore <gore@projectpontiac.com>
Date: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: Need to give up on 2.0


> As useful as such comments are, they're even more useful with 
> proper 
> debugging information. How is anyone supposed to fix the problem if 
> users like you don't go that small extra step? I'll just go ahead 
> and 
> quote S. Vasko directly:
> 
> "could you recompile AS with --enable-gdb and then spool output 
> into log 
> like so :
> afterstep -l ~/afterstep.log
> and then e-mail me this log."
> 
> Frank
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The AfterStep Window Manager for X User's Mailing List
> http://mail.afterstep.org/mailman/listinfo/as-users
> 

_______________________________________________
The AfterStep Window Manager for X User's Mailing List
http://mail.afterstep.org/mailman/listinfo/as-users

• Next message: Frank Gore "Re: Need to give up on 2.0"
• Previous message: Frank Gore "Re: Need to give up on 2.0"