Final call for votes on Reply-To: header
Doug Alcorn (doug@lathi.net)
10 Jan 2000 22:31:18 -0500
I have recieved a handfull of votes on this subject. Before I close
it out and impose the decision, I wanted to make one more call for
votes. I will close voting out this Friday Jan 14. Here is the
original call for votes:
>OK, since there have been two request to munge the Reply-To and three request
>not to munge the Reply-To I will put it to a vote. First, go read
>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html. Then send your vote to me in
>a personal mail to doug@lathi.net. I will summarize the votes back to the list
>and take any necessary action to comply with the popular vote.
>
>Send me a vote for either:
>
>1. Leave the Reply-To header unmodified with the original sender's address.
>
>2. Change the Reply-To header to the mailing list.
>
>In either case, I will be leaving the "X-Mailing-List: as-users" header. That
>doesn't hurt anyone and helps several. I will also use the "X-as-users-dont-
>resend: " header in my efforts to prevent further mail loops. Further, I have
>changed the message footer to be smaller. I hope more people are happy than
>unhappy.
--
(__) Doug Alcorn | program == list of computer instructions
oo / doug@lathi.net | firmware == program that is not user modifiable
|_/ http://www.lathi.net | software == program that a user can modify
Cincinnati, OH | "If you don't have the source, it's not software"
--
To unsubscribe, send a message to as-users-request@afterstep.org with subject
unsubscribe. For more details, see http://www.afterstep.org.