Re: stability of 1.6

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Andrew Sullivan "Apologies to the list....."
• Previous message: Wandered Inn "stability of 1.6"

In my experience, 1.6.0 (haven't installed 1.6.6 yet) is quite stable once
you get it configured.  I've had it crash maybe twice in the almost a
month that I've used it heavily at work.  Much better than 1.4.x if I
remember correctly...

Ben

On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Wandered Inn wrote:

> I've been running 1.4.0 for a while, and was considering upgrading to
> the latest 1.6 stuff.  I'm a bit concerned based on the number of
> problems I've seen pass this list.  How would people compare the
> stability of 1.4 verses 1.6?  1.4 works fine, although there are some
> small problems that kind of bug me.  I use this box for work, so I
> really can't afford less stability.  Thanks for any feedback.
> 
> Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric@denali.atlnet.com
> 
> You mean you paid MONEY for Service Pack '98????
> 
> --
>    WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
>    FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
>    MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html
> 


--
   WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
   FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
   MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html

• Next message: Andrew Sullivan "Apologies to the list....."
• Previous message: Wandered Inn "stability of 1.6"