Re: Upgrading AS, libc5 okay?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: David LaMothe "Re: Upgrading AS, libc5 okay?"
• Previous message: Andrew Sullivan "Re: Upgrading AS, libc5 okay?"

On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> So, since Guylhem just told me I should make a patch to add the most
> recent FAQ to the source tree, I'm wondering what the developers think:
> should the HTML be distributed _instead_ of the SGML?  Comments welcome.

Uh, never mind.  I have managed finally to start playing with b5, and I've
discovered that the html's already included.  Egg, meet face.

Andrew Sullivan | asullivan@sprint.ca (better)| ajsulliv@mcmaster.ca (worse)
                                   *  *  *
                Go to http://lowrent.org/asfaq/, or issue
'finger -l ajsulliv@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca' to find the AfterStep FAQ file.


--
   WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
   FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
   MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html

• Next message: David LaMothe "Re: Upgrading AS, libc5 okay?"
• Previous message: Andrew Sullivan "Re: Upgrading AS, libc5 okay?"