NO_TEXTURE

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: David Mihm "Re: dSetting desktop root"
• Previous message: David Mihm "as.themes.org & beta2 [was Re: Solaris 2.6 status]"

Would it be reasonable to remove NO_TEXTURE?  It doesn't use any unusual 
features, and when I tested AS with NO_TEXTURE off, it made no difference 
in memory usage!

Some parts of AfterStep are becoming very difficult to read/modify because 
of the tangle of ifdef-guarded code.  It would be useful to take a look at 
removing some of those defines, IMO.  Some options could become run-time, 
and perhaps some (like NO_TEXTURE) could be removed entirely.

Opinions?

----
Ethan Fischer
allanon@crystaltokyo.com
http://members.xoom.com/allanon1

• Next message: David Mihm "Re: dSetting desktop root"
• Previous message: David Mihm "as.themes.org & beta2 [was Re: Solaris 2.6 status]"