Re: Solaris 2.6 status

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Vasileios Lourdas "Re: Solaris 2.6 status"
• Previous message: Guylhem Aznar "Re: Solaris 2.6 status"

The guys at as.themes.org claim that they _already have_ beta 2.  Is that
true??

Ben

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Ben Tracy              |                                            |
| WSI Corporation        | If a man speaks in a forest with no woman  |
| Billerica,MA           | around to hear him, is he still wrong?     |
| bjtracy@wsicorp.com    |                                            |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, Guylhem Aznar wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 02, 1998 at 12:15:57AM -0400, Dave Wreski wrote:
> > The majority of the other problems were linking problems, which I could
> > probably fix as well..
> 
> Please send me your patch, I'll try to put it in beta2 (coming very soon)
> 
> -- 
> ____/|  "Letting people bear arms is letting them kill our children"
> \ o.O|            Enlever rrremovethis / Remove rrremovethis
>  =(_)=                           Salut / Best regards
>   \u/          Guylhem AZNAR <guylhem@rrremovethis.oeil.qc.ca>
> 
> --
>    WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
>    FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
>    MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html
> 


--
   WWW:   http://www.afterstep.org/
   FTP:   ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
   MAIL:  http://www.caldera.com/linuxcenter/forums/afterstep.html

• Next message: Vasileios Lourdas "Re: Solaris 2.6 status"
• Previous message: Guylhem Aznar "Re: Solaris 2.6 status"