Re: Good customisation sites?
Andrew Sullivan (ajsulliv@sprint.ca)
Tue, 7 Jul 1998 13:48:58 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 7 Jul 1998, Albert Dorofeev wrote:
> As a matter of fact I wonder if it wasn't a sabotage...
> I agree with you and rather have a menu description
> in a file like for Wharf so that I can explicitely
> specify all of it. This directory structure drives
> me nuts. Is it possible to get rid of it for good?
> Or maybe someone likes it?
Enough! The justification for the directory-structure approach is
compatibility with the GNUstep project. This has been discussed over &
over again on this list, & is in the archives. Moreover, there's a whole
section about it in the FAQ. The FAQ also tells you how to get around it
if you don't like it.
There's a reason it's called _Frequently_ Asked Questions, you know.
</rant>
Andrew Sullivan | asullivan@sprint.ca (better)| ajsulliv@mcmaster.ca (worse)
* * *
'finger -l ajsulliv@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca' to find the AfterStep FAQ file.
--
WWW: http://www.afterstep.org/
FTP: ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
MAIL: http://wormhole.eosys.com/mailing-lists/AfterStep-Info.html
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail afterstep-request@eosys.com