Re: Version number
Guylhem Aznar guylhem-as@danmark.linux.eu.org
Sat, 9 May 1998 13:06:09 +0200 (CEST)
> I really think we should stick to some nomenclature like the Linux kernel
> does ... take 1.4xxx for developement, 1.5 for stable, 1.6xxx for next
> devel ... and so on ... maybe we should - like M$ is doing always - skip
> one number and call the next stable 1.6 - like the kernels.
There's still a version number BUT ALSO a codename (like redhat picasso ...)
easy to remember.
> Vince
>
> PS: There was a guy asking what makes the difference between AfterStep,
> WindowMaker, Enlightenment etc. To be honest: I visited all the web sites
> and did not really get the point of main advantages and disadvantages.
>
> Another question: Can't there be put some effort together? I saw the lovely
> Themes (themes.org) available and almost started to cry - so cute!
We should soon add a Theme management to AS : background + sound + look&feel
(and maybe icons, still not decided)
If WM & EL guys mailed us, we could make a "unified" theme mode
Tell them about that ;)
Last thing I suggered (to WM) was making WM & AS config. file compatible, even
if I had to change AS a lot, bare they made an effort too.
Never received any answer.
> V.
Salut / Best regards,
Guylhem <guylhem@oeil.qc.ca>
AfterStep & Linux HOWTOs
--
WWW: http://www.afterstep.org/
FTP: ftp://ftp.afterstep.org/
MAIL: http://wormhole.eosys.com/mailing-lists/AfterStep-Info.html
FAQ: http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/zamboni/afterstep/FAQ.html
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail afterstep-request@eosys.com