Re: top output
Michal Vitecek (M.Vitecek@sh.cvut.cz)
Sat, 12 Sep 1998 14:00:19 +0200
Ethan wrote:
>
>Oops, forgot to put in the top output:
>
>46 processes: 43 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 1 stopped
>CPU states: 18.1% user, 3.1% system, 0.0% nice, 79.0% idle
>Mem: 23016K av, 22224K used, 792K free, 14760K shrd, 736K buff
>Swap: 16124K av, 9892K used, 6232K free 8792K cached
> PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
>30096 root 1 0 1180 1180 920 S 0 1.5 5.1 0:01 afterstep
>
here's mine (from top):
80 processes: 78 sleeping, 1 running, 1 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 4.4% user, 4.0% system, 0.0% nice, 91.9% idle
Mem: 127972K av, 119768K used, 8204K free, 41672K shrd, 12276K buff
Swap: 40316K av, 68K used, 40248K free 79780K cached
6399 fuf 0 0 996 996 848 S 0 0.0 0.7 0:00 asmail
6386 fuf 0 0 964 964 744 S 0 0.0 0.7 0:00 afterstep
and from (ps xua):
fuf 6386 0.0 0.7 2008 964 p2 S 13:21 0:00 /home/fuf/temp/afterstep
fuf 6399 0.0 0.7 1936 996 p2 S 13:21 0:00 asmail -geometry +0+0
the difference in output is over 1M! how's that possible? what number is
correct then?
--
fuf
------------------------------ na IRC -------------------------------------
BillGates [bgates@www.microsoft.com] has joined #LINUX
...
mode/#linux [+b BillGates!*@*] by DoDad
BillGates was kicked off #linux by DoDad (banned: We see enough of Bill
Gates already.)